Greenland To -65.3C (-85.5F); Historic Blizzard Buries The Northeast; 2025 Had The Lowest Global Wildfire Emissions On Record; + CO2 Is Not A Pollutant
Greenland To -65.3C (-85.5F); Historic Blizzard Buries The Northeast; 2025 Had The Lowest Global Wildfire Emissions On Record; + CO2 Is Not A Pollutant
Already a qualifying Patreon member? Refresh to access this content.
12 Thoughts to “Greenland To -65.3C (-85.5F); Historic Blizzard Buries The Northeast; 2025 Had The Lowest Global Wildfire Emissions On Record; + CO2 Is Not A Pollutant”
I am a degreed botanist so I am fully agree that CO2 is NOT a pollutant. It is in fact essential for life on this planet. Without it we die. Actually if CO2 in our atmosphere drops to less than 200 parts per million, we all die. It is as simple as that. Simplistically CO2 plus water is converted into oxygen and sugars via photosynthesis. Without photosynthesis oxygen disappears fairly rapidly. The Green New Deal efforts to eliminate CO2 is essentially trying to kill us all. We need much more CO2 in our atmosphere than currently exists, not less. More CO2, means more and better food along with more oxygen. The greening of the deserts is just one of the many surprising (to most) benefits. Love CO2!
Hi Allen.
The lowest historical atmospheric CO2 levels have been recorded at 182 ppm, which occurred at the end of the last glacial advance.
( source: my putor and Dr. Patrick Moore )
I would change the above statement from recorded to assessed as some suggest CO2 can escape from ice core samples.
It is commonly stated that an atmospheric level of CO2 at 150 PPM is where broad plant suffocation occurs.
Any comments?
Don’t you guys ever get tired of saying perhaps, maybe, it could be? I know I get tired of hearing it, especially after 20+ years. Either it is or it isn’t, for Pete’s sake and I would say the same thing to Valentina, given the opportunity!
I am a degreed botanist so I am fully agree that CO2 is NOT a pollutant. It is in fact essential for life on this planet. Without it we die. Actually if CO2 in our atmosphere drops to less than 200 parts per million, we all die. It is as simple as that. Simplistically CO2 plus water is converted into oxygen and sugars via photosynthesis. Without photosynthesis oxygen disappears fairly rapidly. The Green New Deal efforts to eliminate CO2 is essentially trying to kill us all. We need much more CO2 in our atmosphere than currently exists, not less. More CO2, means more and better food along with more oxygen. The greening of the deserts is just one of the many surprising (to most) benefits. Love CO2!
Hi Allen.
The lowest historical atmospheric CO2 levels have been recorded at 182 ppm, which occurred at the end of the last glacial advance.
( source: my putor and Dr. Patrick Moore )
I would change the above statement from recorded to assessed as some suggest CO2 can escape from ice core samples.
It is commonly stated that an atmospheric level of CO2 at 150 PPM is where broad plant suffocation occurs.
Any comments?
I do not want to test either the 150ppm or the 200ppm level. I suspect we’d all be suffering long before CO2 levels dropped that low.
Three consecutive days without a sunspot. Quite a reversal.
Does Professor Valentina Zharkova know something that Spinkly does not?
I see you’ve been using the sensible side of your brain lately. You’ll get tired of that, and when you do, I’ll be waiting…
Enjoying my longer days.
Waiste of good daylight time. Mumble mumble, grumble grumble.,
Bite yourself, Muffin!
Well, darnit! There goes my New Year’s resolution!.😝
It may be that LIAs begin, in part, with a more rapid reduction in solar energy than what normally occurs on the back side of a solar cycle.
Perhaps some component of the good professor’s double dynamo theory indicates such a reduction.
Don’t you guys ever get tired of saying perhaps, maybe, it could be? I know I get tired of hearing it, especially after 20+ years. Either it is or it isn’t, for Pete’s sake and I would say the same thing to Valentina, given the opportunity!
A well regarded maxim is;
‘It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.’